Needlestick in UK anaesthetists
Clinical bottom line
Anaesthetists often under-report incidents, and often fail to collect blood samples from themselves or their patients on a routine basis when needlestick injuries occur.
Reference:
HJ Wise, RN McCormick. Re-enforcing hygiene practices of anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 1999 54: 1220-1221.
Study
Postal survey, in 1998, of 75 anaesthetist of various grades in two anaesthetic departments. The response rate was 69%.
Results
The main results are shown in Table 1. Most anaesthetists wore gloves routinely, but three-quarters re-sheathed needles, at least occasionally. Few who had needlestick injuries from hollow bore devices reported the incident or took blood from themselves or their patients.
Table 1: Findings in UK anaesthetists
|
Topics |
Percent |
| Had HBV immunity checked in previous 5 years |
100 |
| Wear gloves routinely |
58 |
| Resheath needles on occasion |
73 |
| At least one needlestick injury from hollow bore needle |
50 |
|
of whom blood sample taken after incident for HBV |
11 |
| of whom blood sample taken from the patient |
22 |
| of whom incident reported to occupational health department |
15 |
Comment
Like other surveys, this shows that professionals often under-report incidents, and often fail to collect blood samples from themselves or their patients on a routine basis when needlestick injuries occur.