Migraine league table from a systematic review
Clinical bottom line
A systematic review of triptans in acute migraine from Canada gives a league table for headache response and pain free outcomes at two hours.
Reference
MJ Gawel et al. A systematic review of the use of triptans in acute migraine. Canadian Journal of Neurological Science 2001 28: 30-41.
Review
This review sought to consolidate evidence for triptans available in Canada. That point is important, since the review is not comprehensive and some doses of some triptans are not reviewed. Otherwise randomised full publications of trials of triptans in migraine were sought using MEDLINE. It is not stated what the inclusion criteria were, but the trials were commercial phase 3 trials, which were double blind, and used IHS criteria for definition of migraine.
The outcomes sought were headache response at one or two hours, pain free at one or two hours, and a clinical disability score of 0 or 1 at two hours. Oral rizatriptan did not include buccal wafers, which were analysed separately from a single trial.
Results
Only the two hour results are discussed here. At one hour there was less effect ( see rizatriptan review ), but the relative positions of treatments was similar.
Headache response at two hours
For headache initially moderate or severe to disappear or be only mild at two hours, results are shown in Table 1, In Figure 1 for the NNTs and in Figure 2 for the percentage of patients benefiting. Clearly subcutaneous sumatriptan was superior, but of the oral triptans rizatriptan 10 mg was the best.
Note that treatments are comparable, with similar response rates in the placebo groups.
Table 1: Headache response at two hours
|
Percent responding to |
||||||
|
Treatment |
Route |
Number of trials |
Number of patients |
Treatment |
Placebo |
NNT (95%CI) |
| Sumatriptan 6 mg |
Subcut |
5 |
818 |
71 |
21 |
2.0 (1.8 to 2.3) |
| Rizatriptan 10 mg |
Oral |
6 |
2797 |
74 |
28 |
2.2 (1.8 to 2.7) |
| Sumatriptan 50 mg |
Oral |
3 |
927 |
65 |
31 |
3.0 (2.5 to 3.7) |
| Sumatriptan 100 mg |
Oral |
12 |
2914 |
57 |
25 |
3.1 (2.8 to 3.4) |
| Sumatriptan 20 mg |
Intranasal |
5 |
1266 |
63 |
34 |
3.5 (3.0 to 4.3) |
| Zolmitriptan 2.5 mg |
Oral |
2 |
651 |
64 |
35 |
3.5 (2.7 to 4.7) |
| Naratriptan 2.5 mg |
Oral |
2 |
1437 |
47 |
28 |
5.1 (4.1 to 6.7) |
Figure 1: NNT for headache response at 2 hours
|
|
Figure 2: Percentage of patients with headache response at 2 hours (95% confidence interval |
|
|
Pain free at two hoursFor headache initially moderate or severe to disappear and for patients to be pain free at two hours, results are shown in Table 2, In Figure 3 for the NNTs and in Figure 4for the percentage of patients benefiting. Clearly subcutaneous sumatriptan was superior, but of the oral triptans rizatriptan 10 mg was the best. Note that treatments are comparable, with similar response rates in the placebo groups. For sumatriptan 6 mg subcutaneous there were only 110 patients in a single trial, so that placebo comparisons are not sensible. Table 2: Pain free at two hours
Figure 3: NNT for pain free at 2 hours |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Figure 4: Percentage of patients with headache response at 2 hours (95% confidence interval |
|
|
Clinical disability at two hours
This refers to patients who had a disability score of 0 or 1 at two hours. The results are shown in Table 3, but note the very wide differences in the rates obtained with placebo, making comparison between treatments suspect. It may actually make the outcome itself unreliable, but as no details were given of what actual outcome was used in each of the trials, it is difficult to comment.
Table 3: Clinical disability at two hours
|
Percent responding to |
||||||
|
Treatment |
Route |
Number of trials |
Number of patients |
Treatment |
Placebo |
NNT (95%CI) |
| Sumatriptan 6 mg |
Subcut |
3 |
268 |
72 |
30 |
2.3 (1.9 to 3.1) |
| Rizatriptan 10 mg |
Oral |
5 |
2040 |
44 |
17 |
3.7 (3.2 to 4.3) |
| Sumatriptan 100 mg |
Oral |
6 |
1269 |
38 |
19 |
5.4 (4.3 to 7.4) |
| Sumatriptan 20 mg |
Intranasal |
3 |
1116 |
72 |
52 |
4.9 (3.8 to 7.0) |
| Sumatriptan 50 mg |
Oral |
4 |
1271 |
42 |
24 |
5.3 (4.1 to 7.5) |
| Naratriptan 2.5 mg |
Oral |
2 |
1437 |
66 |
48 |
5.6 (4.3 to 7.7) |
Comment
This is a valuable study, despite not comprehensively covering all the doses of all the triptans. The information here agrees well with that in other systematic reviews, and for headache response at two hours summarised in a larger assessment of relative efficacy .